The ANZ website contains the following tabs:

The About us category contains the following sections:

Log onRegister

Historical reports - Corporate Responsibility

Historical reports

2009 interim results

Half year results: October 2008 - March 2009

Projects reviewed
Categories Reviewed Conformed to EP Financed
Category A 0 0 1
Category B 3 3 3
Category C 4 4 5
Total 7 7 9

*Two projects financed in 2009 were assessed in 2008.

Location of projects
Categories Projects in high income OECD countries Projects outside high income OECD countries
Category A 0 0
Category B 3 0
Category C 4 0
Total 7 0
Projects reviewed by sector
Categories Natural resources Infrastructure Power and utilities Diversified
Category A 0 0 0 0
Category B 1 0 2 0
Category C 0 3 1 0
Total 1 3 3 0

The future

ANZ maintains its commitment to assess all large project finance proposals using the Equator Principles.

2008 results

Full year results: October 2007 - September 2008

In the year from October 2007 and September 2008, we reviewed 33 projects under the Equator Principles. Nine of these projects were not financed - four of these projects are still under consideration by project financiers and/or the project sponsor before a final decision is made. The remaining five did not proceed for a range of reasons, which may include the sponsor not being able to meet our funding conditions; the project not proceeding; or ANZ's bid not being accepted by the project sponsor.

Projects reviewed
Categories Reviewed Conformed to EP Financed
Category A 3 2 0
Category B 16 16 14
Category C 14 14 10
Total 33 32 24
Location of projects
Categories Projects in high income OECD countries Projects outside high income OECD counries
Category A 1 2
Category B 16 0
Category C 13 1
Total 30 3
Projects reviewed by sector
Categories Natural resources Infrastructure Power and utilities Diversified
Category A 0 0 2 1
Category B 7 3 6 0
Category C 1 2 6 5
Total 8 5 14 6

Half year results: October 2007 - March 2008

Projects reviewed
Categories Reviewed Financed
Category A 1 0
Category B 13 10
Category C 7 4
Total 21 14

Reasons for non-financed of projects
Seven projects reviewed under the Equator Principles in this half were not financed.

Three of these projects did not proceed for reasons unrelated to social or environmental issues. The other four projects are still subject to further consideration by project financiers and/or the project sponsor before a final decision is made.


Projects financed this half but not reviewed
Four projects (in addition to those reported in the above table) were financed in this reporting period but were reviewed under the Equator Principles in the previous reporting period (before 1 October 2007).

Location of projects
Categories Projects in high income OECD countries Projects outside high income OECD countries
Category A 0 1
Category B 13 0
Category C 6 1
Total 19 2

2007 results

Full year results: December 2006 - September 2007

Projects reviewed
Categories Reviewed Financed
Category A 5 4
Category B 18 10
Category C 3 2
Total 26 16*

* One of the 16 projects did not meet the full reporting requirements of the Equator Principles however, and has therefore been assessed as non-compliant. The non-compliant project, although financed after ANZ adopted the Equator Principles, was negotiated prior to the Bank's adoption of the Principles and the client was permitted to continue managing its environmental and social performance to ANZ's pre-Equator Principles internal standards. The variance was considered minor and related to a process rather than material environmental social issue.

Location of projects
Categories Projects in high income OECD countries Projects outside high income OECD countries
Category A 3 2
Category B 14 4
Category C 1 2
Total 18 8
Projects reviewed by sector
Categories Natural resources Infrastructure Power and utilities Diversified
Category A 4 0 1 0
Category B 4 6 3 5
Category C 0 0 1 2
Total 8 6 5 7